SearchFor GPs and referrersRoom Rentals
Book a Session
Two older women laughing together on a sunlit beach with two men walking behind them with a dog.
Blog · Older adults · 9 min read

ADHD after sixty: how the picture changes, and what support looks like at this stage

ADHD is lifelong, but its picture changes after sixty. A psychologist on what the recent evidence says about recognition, differential diagnosis, and support.

Therapy for older adults at Equal Psychology →
In this post
Written by
Natalia Cajide Registered psychologist · AHPRA PSY0002474316 · All posts by Natalia
Published
Last updated

When I sit with someone in their sixties or seventies who is asking, for the first time, whether what they have been carrying their whole life might be ADHD, the conversation rarely starts with a list of symptoms. It starts with a much quieter question. Was this me all along, or am I now becoming someone I do not recognise?

It is a question worth taking seriously. The research on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, in older adults is still catching up to what many people have been living through privately for decades. ADHD is a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition, which means it begins in childhood and continues across the lifespan, including into the sixties, seventies and beyond. What changes in later life is not whether ADHD is there. It is how the picture looks, how easily it is recognised, and what kinds of support actually fit a person at this stage of life.

This piece is for older adults who suspect ADHD has been part of their story, and for the people who care about them. I want to walk through three things, in order: how the picture changes in late life, how to think clearly about the difference between ADHD and other conditions that look similar, and what good support actually involves at this age.

The recognition gap, in numbers

Older adults with ADHD are not rare. They are mostly undiagnosed. Dobrosavljevic and colleagues (2020), in a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty studies including more than twenty million participants published in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, reported that the pooled prevalence of ADHD in older adults is around two point one eight per cent when measured by validated research scales, but only zero point zero nine per cent when measured by current treatment. Treatment runs at less than one twentieth of the rate at which the symptoms show up in the population.

What that gap describes is several decades of people quietly explaining themselves to themselves. The internal forgetfulness, the restlessness that never quite settled, the difficulty finishing what was started, the relationships and jobs strained by patterns no one could quite name. ADHD was not widely understood in adults when most people now in their sixties and seventies were children. The traits were attributed to personality, to upbringing, to temperament. They were rarely attributed to a brain that processes attention and reward in a particular way.

Naming this gap is not academic. It is the foundation of every conversation that follows in this piece. Many older adults arriving at an assessment today are not developing something new. They are recognising something old.

What the prevalence numbers actually mean

Around two in every hundred older adults show ADHD on validated screening, but fewer than one in a thousand are being treated for it. The condition is not unusual at this age. The recognition of it is.

How the picture changes in late life

The diagnostic criteria for ADHD are essentially the same across the lifespan, but the way they show up in a sixty-five year old life is different from how they show up in a twenty-five year old one. Pardo-Palenzuela, Onandia-Hinchado and Diaz-Orueta (2026), in a systematic review of the cognitive profile of ADHD in older adults published in Journal of Attention Disorders, and Fischer and Nilsen (2024), in a scoping review of older-adult ADHD published in Aging and Mental Health, describe a fairly consistent pattern.

Visible hyperactivity tends to soften. The boy who could not sit still in class is more likely, at sixty, to describe an inner restlessness that does not look obviously like ADHD from the outside. He may pace less, but feel more wound up internally, struggle to relax, find sustained sitting uncomfortable, or notice a constant low hum of agitation that has no obvious cause.

Inattention becomes the more obvious feature. This often reads as forgetting where things are placed, losing the thread of a conversation, putting off tasks that involve sustained mental effort, repeatedly missing appointments, or struggling to organise the practical scaffolding of a day. Impulsivity may show up less as physical action and more in conversation, financial decisions, or interpersonal moments where the response arrives a little ahead of the consideration.

What also tends to surface in older life, for both clinical and personal reasons, is the emotional weight that has accumulated alongside untreated ADHD. Years of attributing one's difficulties to personal failure rather than to a recognisable neurodevelopmental pattern leaves a particular kind of residue. Lower mood, anxiety, social withdrawal and a more fragile sense of self can sit alongside the core ADHD picture in older adults, and are part of what good clinical work needs to attend to.

Is it ADHD, or something else?

The most important question in older-adult ADHD assessment is not whether ADHD is possible. It is whether what a person is experiencing is ADHD, something else, or some combination of the two. This is where the work has to be careful.

Several conditions in late life can look superficially like ADHD. Mild cognitive impairment, the early stages of dementia, depression, anxiety, thyroid difficulty, sleep disorders, side effects of common medications, and the cognitive impact of bereavement or major life change can all produce attention difficulties, forgetfulness or disorganisation. Pardo-Palenzuela and colleagues (2026) note that distinguishing between ADHD and these conditions in older adults is genuinely complex, because the surface features overlap and because more than one condition is often present at the same time.

There is one feature that helps separate ADHD from late-life cognitive decline more reliably than any other. ADHD has been there the whole time. When I am taking a careful history with someone in their sixties or seventies, the question that earns its place is not what is happening now. It is what was happening at school, at twenty, at thirty, at forty. A lifelong, stable pattern of inattention, restlessness or impulsivity points in the direction of ADHD. A meaningful change from a previous baseline points in a different direction and warrants a different kind of assessment.

This matters in both directions. Calling something ADHD when it is the early presentation of a neurodegenerative condition delays appropriate care. Calling something dementia when it is unrecognised lifelong ADHD denies a person both an accurate explanation and access to support that may help. Any new or accelerating change in attention, memory or function in later life deserves a proper differential assessment, not a quick attribution in either direction.

The single most useful question
Is the difficulty new, or has it been there the whole time? Lifelong patterns point toward ADHD. Meaningful changes from a previous baseline deserve a different kind of assessment, not an ADHD label.

Medication considerations after sixty

Medication is one of several options for ADHD in adulthood, and decisions about it are clinical decisions made between a person and their treating prescriber. What I want to do here is describe what the current evidence says about how those decisions tend to be approached after sixty, so that the conversation with the prescriber is informed.

The Australian evidence-based clinical practice guideline for ADHD (Bellgrove and colleagues, 2023, published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry and endorsed by the National Health and Medical Research Council) lists stimulant and non-stimulant medications among the recommended pharmacological options for adult ADHD, alongside non-pharmacological supports. The guideline emphasises that prescribing in older adults should include careful cardiovascular assessment before starting medication, lower starting doses, slower titration and ongoing monitoring.

Tadrous and colleagues (2021), in a cohort study of more than thirty thousand adults aged sixty-six and over published in JAMA Network Open, reported a roughly forty per cent increase in cardiovascular events within the first thirty days of starting a stimulant. The risk attenuated over time and was no longer present at one hundred and eighty days or beyond. What this tells us is not that stimulants cannot be used in older adults, but that the early window after starting deserves close clinical attention. This is part of why guideline-concordant prescribing in this age group involves physical assessment beforehand, conservative initial dosing, and active monitoring during the first weeks.

The clinical conversation is rarely about whether to start medication in isolation. It is about how medication, if it is being considered, fits alongside everything else that supports a person at this stage of life.

What non-pharmacological support actually involves

Non-pharmacological support is not a backup plan when medication is not available or not wanted. The Australian guideline (Bellgrove and colleagues, 2023) recommends cognitive-behavioural intervention, environmental adjustment and ADHD coaching as part of standard care for adults with ADHD. For older adults, this often takes a particular shape.

Liu and colleagues (2023), in a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of cognitive-behavioural intervention in adults with ADHD published in Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, reported that this kind of structured psychological work was associated with reductions in core ADHD symptoms, in the emotional symptoms that frequently sit alongside them, and improvements in self-esteem and quality of life. In an older-adult context, what often matters most is the part of the work that helps a person rebuild a coherent story of their own life. Many people arriving at an assessment in their sixties or seventies have carried decades of explanations that did not fit. Having an accurate framework, even late, can change how the past is remembered and how the present is approached.

Beyond formal therapy, the practical supports that tend to help in later life are the same ones that help any ADHD adult, applied with the particular shape of an older-adult life in mind. External structure (written reminders, calendars, simple visible routines) carries more of the load than memory. Sleep, movement, daylight and connection are not soft additions; they are part of what keeps an ADHD nervous system regulated. Social connection, in particular, does protective work that is easy to underestimate. Fischer and Nilsen (2024) note that loneliness and isolation are common challenges for older adults with ADHD, and that the quality of close relationships shapes daily functioning more than almost anything else at this stage.

Knowing when to seek an assessment

If the patterns described in this piece feel familiar, and have felt familiar for as long as you can remember, an ADHD assessment in adulthood is not too late and not unusual. A proper assessment in this age group involves taking a careful developmental history, screening for the other conditions that can look similar, and considering what physical and mental health context the assessment is sitting inside.

If the difficulties feel new, or different from how you used to function, the right first step is usually a conversation with a general practitioner about a broader assessment, not specifically an ADHD assessment. A new change in attention or memory in older life always warrants a careful look at sleep, mood, medication, physical health and any signs of cognitive change, before any single label is applied.

Either way, having the conversation with someone who works in this territory tends to be more useful than carrying the question alone. Recognition, accurate or not, is the start of the work, not the end of it.

References

Bellgrove, M. A., Bellato, A., May, T., Gan, L., Stenz, A., Ettridge, K., Beare, R., Reilly, A., Mongia, M., Tatasciore, M., & Cortese, S. (2023). The Australian evidence-based clinical practice guideline for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 57(8), 1101–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674231166329

Dobrosavljevic, M., Solares, C., Cortese, S., Andershed, H., & Larsson, H. (2020). Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.042

Fischer, S., & Nilsen, C. (2024). ADHD in older adults – a scoping review. Aging and Mental Health, 28(9), 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2339994

Liu, C. I., Hua, M. H., Lu, M. L., & Goh, K. K. (2023). Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural-based interventions for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder extends beyond core symptoms: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 96(3), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12455

Pardo-Palenzuela, N., Onandia-Hinchado, I., & Diaz-Orueta, U. (2026). Cognitive profile of ADHD in older adults: A systematic review. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251385758

Tadrous, M., Shakeri, A., Chu, C., Watt, J., Mamdani, M. M., Juurlink, D. N., & Gomes, T. (2021). Assessment of stimulant use and cardiovascular event risks among older adults. JAMA Network Open, 4(10), e2130795. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30795

Filed under Older adults · Neurodiversity-affirming · Healthcare navigation · Older adults
A note from Natalia

I write as a way of putting language around what I see in the work. What you do with it is yours. The people I sit with often carry more resources than they realise. Often, the work is simply noticing what is already there. If something here has helped you notice, then it has served its purpose.

Natalia Cajide, Registered Psychologist

Would you like to meet Natalia →

Disclaimer: The information provided in this blog post is for educational and informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional psychological or medical advice. The content is intended to support general wellbeing and personal growth, but it may not address specific individual needs. If you have mental health concerns or require personalised support, please consult a qualified healthcare provider. Equal Psychology and its authors are not liable for any actions taken based on this information.